Constructible number? |
Did you mean | Travel | Economics | Finance | Marketing | Business | Culture | Geography | History | Life | Mathematics | Science | Society | Technology | New site added |
| Add a link on the top of this Constructible number page Express submission by secure payment ! |
A point in the Euclidean plane is a constructible point if, given a fixed coordinate system (or a fixed line segment of unit length), one can construct the point with unruled straightedge and compass. A complex number is a constructible number if its corresponding point in the Euclidean plane is constructible from the usual x- and y-coordinate axes.
Note that this is quite a distinct notion from Gödel's constructible universe, L; though every number that is constructible in the sense of this article is in L, the converse fails badly.
It can then be shown that a real number is constructible if and only if, given a line segment of unit length, one can construct a line segment of length | r | with ruler and compass. It can also be shown that a complex number is constructible if and only if its real and imaginary parts are constructible.
The set of constructible numbers can be completely characterized in the language of field theory. This has the effect of transforming geometric questions about ruler-and-compass constructions into algebra. This transformation leads to the solutions of many famous mathematical problems, which defied centuries of attack.
Have to see |
Contents |
|
Geometric definitions
The geometric definition of a constructible point is as follows. First, for any two distinct points P and Q in the plane, let L(P, Q) denote the unique line through P and Q, and let C(P, Q) denote the unique circle with center P, passing through Q. (Note that the order of P and Q matters for the circle.) By convention, L(P, P) = C(P, P) = {P}. Then a point Z is constructible from E, F, G and H if either
- Z is in the intersection of L(E, F) and L(G, H), where L(E, F) ≠ L(G, H);
- Z is in the intersection of C(E, F) and C(G, H), where C(E, F) ≠ C(G, H);
- Z is in the intersection of L(E, F) and C(G, H).
Since the order of E, F, G, and H in the above definition is irrelevant, the four letters may be permuted in any way. Put simply, Z is constructible from E, F, G and H if it lies in the intersection of any two distinct lines, or of any two distinct circles, or of a line and a circle, where these lines and/or circles can be determined by E, F, G, and H, in the above sense.
Now, let A and A' be any two distinct fixed points in the plane. A point Z is construtible if either
- Z = A;
- Z = A'
- there exist points P1, w/., Pn, with Z = Pn, such that for all j ≥ 1, Pj + 1 is constructible from points in the set {A, A', P1, w/., Pj}.
Put simply, Z is constructible if it is either A or A', or if it is obtainable from a finite sequence of points starting with A and A', where each new point is constructible from previous points in the sequence.
The origin O is defined as follows. The circles C(A, A') and C(A', A) intersect in two distinct points; these points determine a unique line, and the origin O is defined to be the intersection of this line with L(A, A').
Transformation into algebra
All rational numbers are constructible, and all constructible numbers are algebraic numbers. Also, if a and b are constructible numbers with b ≠ 0, then a − b and a/b are constructible. Thus, the set K of all constructible complex numbers forms a field, a subfield of the field of algebraic numbers.
Furthermore, K is closed under square roots and complex conjugation. These facts can be used to characterize the field of constructible numbers, because, in essence, the equations defining lines and circles are no worse than quadratic. The characterization is the following: a complex number is constructible if and only if it lies in a field at the top of a finite tower of quadratic extensions, starting with the rational field Q. More precisely, z is constructible if and only if there exists a tower of fields
where z is in Kn and for all 0 ≤ j AND1lt; n, the dimension Kj + 1 : Kj = 2.
Impossible constructions
The algebraic characterization of constructible numbers provides an important necessary condition for constructibility: if z is constructible, then it is algebraic, and its minimal irreducible polynomial has degree a power of 2, or equivalently, the field extension Q(z)/Q has dimension a power of 2. One should note that it is true, (but not obvious to show) that the converse is false — this is not a sufficient condition for constructibility. However, this defect can be remedied by considering the normal closure of Q(z)/Q.
The nonconstructibility of certain numbers proves the impossibility of certain problems attempted by the philosophers of ancient Greece. In the following chart, each row represents a specific ancient construction problem. The left column gives the name of the problem. The second column gives an equivalent algebraic formulation of the problem. In other words, the solution to the problem is affirmative if and only if each number in the given set of numbers is constructible. Finally, the last column provides the simplest known counterexample. In other words, the number in the last column is an element of the set in the same row, but is not constructible.
| Construction problem | Associated set of numbers | Counterexample |
|---|---|---|
| Duplicating the cube |  |
 is not constructible, because its minimal polynomial has degree 3 over Q |
| Trisecting the angle |  |
 is not constructible, because  has minimal polynomial of degree 3 over Q |
| Squaring the circle |  |
 is not constructible, because  is not algebraic over Q |
| Constructing all regular polygons |  |
e2πi / 7 is not constructible, because 7 is not a Fermat prime |